Thanks to MSSP Nexus Blog for pointing out this story. In today's New York Times, there is a story describing a significant policy change directed at hospitals. Of course, this will save Medicare millions of dollars, but what are the unintended consequences of this policy?
Under the new rules, to be published next week, Medicare will not pay hospitals for the costs of treating certain “conditions that could reasonably have been prevented.” Among the conditions that will be affected are bedsores, or pressure ulcers; injuries caused by falls; and infections resulting from the prolonged use of catheters in blood vessels or the bladder.Now, don't get me wrong. I definitely agree with the intent of this idea. There are definitely some hospital infections that could be prevented, and it's been well documented the impact of medical errors during a hospital stay. I understand why patient advocate groups are happy with this policy decision.
In addition, Medicare says it will not pay for the treatment of “serious preventable events” like leaving a sponge or other object in a patient during surgery and providing a patient with incompatible blood or blood products. The new policy — one of several federal initiatives to improve care purchased by Medicare, at a cost of more than $400 billion a year — is sending ripples through the health industry.
With regard to preventing falls, does that mean that hospitals will have to utilize bed restraints more - because in the middle of the night, sometimes patients are confused and don't know that they're trying to get out of bed. Restraints are already a no-no according to some regulatory agencies.
When it comes to preventing infection, I see more unnecessary testing being done to prove that an infection was obtained before hospitalization. What will be the cost of this? In addition, I see even more increased use of antibiotics, which will further increase the resistance of organisms - and complicating the treatment of infections in the future.
So, while the government's intent is noble, I'm afraid of what the unintended consequences will be. If the government wants people to be accountable, they should start cleaning up their own house first. Of course, we know that will never happen...
15 comments:
Call me a pessimist, but I see it as the gov't trying to cut corners...with no "noble" intent at all.
Well I gotta tell you, if hospitals were a little more careful maybe people wouldn't get bedsores and c-difficile. I believe that's what killed my mother in the end and currently my best friends father, just hospitalized one week has hospital pneumonia. Is Medicare private or government run? The first tests they do are urine and blood anyway that should eliminate at least the uti infections which can be deadly. Sponges and stuff, yeh make hospitals a little more responsible. Your right, government needs to clean up it's own house but that doesn't preclude cleaning up the other crap, right....ciao
Don't usually do this, but I'm tagging you for my 3 blog wishes meme...
See my blog for more details:
3 wishes meme
Happy Sunday!
I have to agree that hospitals should probably eat the cost when a sponge is left in at the time of surgery. I'm not convinced, though, that all central line related infections or even all foley-related utis are preventable. Sometimes patients need a central line or a foley, and sometimes those things get infected. It's sort of part of the cost of doing business. Sure, we should minimize their use, and be as sterile as possible with them, but sometimes bad stuff happens.
I agree with midwife with a knife. Hospitals are not intentionally injuring patient's and it is just not possible to avoid all adverse events.
Rositta - just so you know - there's going to be MORE c diff after the regulations are implemented - because people are going to give antibiotics more to prevent the line infections, and antibiotics can cause c.diff.
Ironic, huh?
I have mixed feelings on this one Doc. If they leave something that shouldn't be there inside a patient during surgery then i don't think Medicare should pay for it.
but, bedsores, even with the best of care can sometimes happen with a patient that is in bed 24/7. Also falls should be indiv. situations. If someone gets up and falls how is that the hospitals fault? If someone has dropped them then thats a different story.
I have always felt that if a hospital was at fault, had to "redo" a procedure, or otherwise had an unfavorable outcome that they should not charge the patient for it in the first place.
What I see from this particular situation is another increase in the cost of medical care.
The medical profession will now have to hire a league of auditors and supervisors, etc, which would increase labor costs, which would then be translated to ~me~ as the consumer.
later...
I can understand that hospitals should pay when a sponge is left behind. That makes sense.
But falls and bedsores? No, that just doesn't seem right to me.
To bad we can't go by the honor system. The only one that really knows whether it was a fall or a drop is the individual.
For cases such as a left behind sponge, I agree with everyone that Medicare should not have to pay for that. Even if the rule is unfair about those questionable events like falls and bedsores, maybe it will translate into better care.
I told Cathy my solution to the problem. I'm just plain out right going on a strike. I'm not going to be sick anymore. No more lupus. No more Myasthenia Gravis. They are fired from my body! So is the Asthma and the OCD !
I will, from now on, just plain refuse to get sick anymore. Not reallly sure why, since I've done this, my body seems to think it's in the middle of a lupus flare since lupus has been fired from my body ... hmmm
Hey Dr. A ... I have a new blog friend I want to introduce you to!
This blog sis is a bit special too though, she's not just a blog sis ...she's a sis sis ...by marriage. She's my husband's sister ... and we call each other sister, on many occassions rather than sister in law.
She's started a new blog. She's starting a new business adventure. Her 13 year old is going to public school for the first time ... and she's just ... well ... at an interesting phase in life.
http://theinnersage.blogspot.com/
Please visit her blog, and introduce your friends to her. I'd really appreciate it.
Unfortunately, she knows a bit too much of what we, ourselves do. She has rheumatoid arthritis and fibroid ... and her brother (the baby brother to my husband as well) has Multiple Sclerosis (my poor kids gene pool .... they just don't stand a chance do they?).
She's helped with me, and my husband's issues, as well as helped to educate us and the rest of the family about her brother.
She is often, the overlooked, underappreciated child in the family ... it is really time for her to have some applause and appreciation.
PLEAAAAAAAAAASE go visit her new blog!! PLEASE! She's really a great girl! And she really IS my sister in law!
I just wanted to add a comment here to mention thanks for you very nice ideas. Blogs are troublesome to run and time consuming thus I appreciate when I see well written material. Your time isn’t going to waste with your posts. Thanks so much and stick with it No doubt you will definitely reach your goals! have a great day!
Another informative blog… Thank you for sharing it… Best of luck for further endeavor too.
This is a good common sense article. Very helpful to one who is just finding the resources about this part. It will certainly help educate me.
Thanks for this post. It Very nice article. It was a very good article. I like it. Thanks for sharing knowledge. Ask you to share good article again.
Post a Comment